Getting Defensive
The U.S. military continues its effort to streamline operations, with panels evaluating the closing and consolidation of bases and other facilities.
Apparently, there’s plenty to cut. I wouldn’t know. I can’t claim to know too much about military effectiveness, having gleaned most of my knowledge from reading Tom Clancy and Jane’s as a teen.
I do know a little something about English, and that’s what has me worried. Consider this:
Endorsing the Pentagon’s vision of streamlining support services across the armed forces, the commission also signed off on most recommendations to merge several education, medical and training programs. The Defense Department calls this “jointness” — the services combining their strengths, rather than working separately, to save money and promote efficiency.
Jointness? Somebody needs to get these people a copy of the bullfighter’s guide. What exactly is wrong with “merger”, “cooperation”, “coordination”, “consolidation”, “teamwork”, etc. that inspires the creation of new bullshit words? Answer: everybody wants to maintain their branches and fiefdoms. Which is human nature, to a degree. I just hope they all can spend more time fighting real wars, as opposed to turf wars.
August 25th, 2005 at 3:31 pm
I don’t know, I’m pretty sure I’d rather have them fighting bullshit turf wars, than bullshit real wars. The casualties are less severe, and don’t help terrorist recruitment efforts so much.
August 25th, 2005 at 4:11 pm
Yes, you’re quite right. I should have said “…more time preparing” to fight real wars, possibly also emphasizing the “real”, as opposed to sham.
Also, please tell me your title du jour isn’t a play on “sheik.”
August 29th, 2005 at 4:39 pm
Isn’t US Military spending like a gazillion quadrillion dollars anyway. I doubt sharing a few classrooms is going to make any noticable difference.