TvShirt
Whilst I was Googling for some potential Big Print Bank billboard images, I came across an article in the Sydney Morning Herald discussing two guys who had made this wearable television ad. Obviously, I think it’s a fucking terrible idea. As if we’re not bombarded by invasive marketing messages as it is?
Worst of all, the article was so obsequious. So I just couldn’t resist adding a few comments.
The human billboards
by Kate Cox, 23 November 2003
Dork 1 and Dork 2.
It takes selling your body to a whole new level.
Two young Sydney entrepreneurs and best mates have come up with an innovative marketing scheme: canvas vests with built-in mini televisions that show moving advertisements.
The world-first concept has already been sold to Telstra and was unveiled last night at the Rugby World Cup final – with “Telstra girls” turning heads in the T-shirts.
Veeran Naran, 28, began developing the idea – and a company, Channel Zero – while working as a graphic designer and editor for large sporting and entertainment clients.
“The 25- to 31-year-olds market, in Australia especially, are not at home watching television, they’re at pubs watching television and people,” he said. “So I decided to put televisions on people.”
Two years in the making, the “TelePAK” is powered by a lithium battery and run by DVD, meaning the screening time is unlimited and the interactive “program” can be changed by the model via remote control.
P.S. All you have to do to make something “interactive” is include a remote control?)
Mr Naran’s best mate, 29-year-old former geologist Ben Perry, looks after the business affairs.
The company’s “fusion between a bag and a T-shirt” (and rather large fashion statement) is the latest marketing ploy following the use of Vespas, cars, moving billboards and pavements as advertising mediums.
It is attractive to advertisers because there is no parking needed and it is moveable and immediate.
For consumers, it is interesting rather than evasive – and it is humorous. For the wearer, it is lightweight (about two kilograms) and generally fun – and they can finally co-ordinate their outfit with whatever’s on TV.
Plans are afoot for involvement with the Sydney Festival and the men are also in discussions with large corporations for campaigns during next year’s Athens Olympics.
The second prototype is expected to have more features. “It’s going to be out of this world,” Mr Naran said.
Channel Zero finds the people willing to advertise on their bodies and assists with the creative campaign.
“We believe we are revolutionising outdoor marketing. The advertising market is flooded with creative wallpaper so that people are blind to the message. With this, people will know it is there – not only is it completely different, but it has sound too. People love it – they want to take it home.”
March 10th, 2005 at 8:21 am
oh god help us all. thanks for the analysis jsp – right on the money 🙂
kind of reminds me of a story i read a couple of years back about another “brilliant” marketing campaign. apparently some genius decided it was a great idea to install small television screens inside taxis in manhattan so riders would be forced to watch advertisements as they were going from A to B.
good result though. the public uproar was so loud that the company (within mere months) had to remove all the television screens. the general sentiment was, “i live in NYC and i’m bombarded by marketing messages all day long. the only time i have to think is when i’m sitting in the back of a cab and i’m not about to give that over to the marketers too.” good on ya mates.
March 10th, 2005 at 5:04 pm
I think I read something about that in Wired. They were talking about GPS-enabled cabs with electronic ads on the roof. When driving through, say, Chinatown, the ad could be in Mandarin, etc.
That I don’t mind so much, but the idea of touch-screens in the back of every cab makes me think of annoying gas pumps that try to sell me a car wash (or ATMs that ask if I want to learn about a mortgage!)
If New Yorkers have stemmed the tide, you’re right, good on ’em.
March 10th, 2005 at 11:50 pm
and you still had to pay the fare?
it’d be fine with me if the advertising were paying for my cab ride…
at the moment i have no money to spend on anything at all so sucks to all the stupid advertisers.
March 11th, 2005 at 12:30 am
Yeah, people’s perspective changes when you’re actually benefiting from the ad bucks. For example, I wouldn’t mind having the dealer’s name on the back of the car (something that otherwise drives me crazy) if they’d knock $500 off the price for the marketing rights.
Of course they’d just raise the “invoice” of every car by that amount to compensate for it. You can’t win…
March 11th, 2005 at 12:33 am
p.s. is it just me or does the dork on the left have fucking god awful hair?!
i think i hate them. and they’re in my city!
March 11th, 2005 at 12:37 am
He totally does. Wanker! 🙂
Yeah, I was trying to guess where that is. Dork 2 is standing in front of a ‘Witchery’ sign. Pitt or George St, you think?
March 11th, 2005 at 12:40 am
Got it. Paddington. Witchery Paddington (332 Oxford Street), Bread of France (328A Oxford street). Good lord, I don’t know what’s scarier: the fact that I discovered that in a few minutes, or that they could be team members!
March 11th, 2005 at 12:54 am
you replied before i did
it’s oxford street, yes
the place where all expensive wanky brand names live
and also the fabulous max brenner…
mmmm choc-o-lait
i almost hope i see them so i can call them names and make them cry.
haha.