<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jsp.org &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsp.org/category/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsp.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Olbermann on 8</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2008/11/11/olbermann-on-8/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2008/11/11/olbermann-on-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jsp.org/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff: Keith Olbermann&#8217;s &#8220;Special Comment&#8221; on CA&#8217;s Prop 8 (video).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff: Keith Olbermann&#8217;s <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27652443#27652443">&#8220;Special Comment&#8221; on CA&#8217;s Prop 8</a> (video).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2008/11/11/olbermann-on-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food Network, Perhaps?</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2006/11/22/food-network-perhaps/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2006/11/22/food-network-perhaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media & Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WtF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2006/11/22/food-network-perhaps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday&#8217;s Romenesko carried this blurb on a Hollywood Reporter piece (sub. req.): Fox News to air &#8220;Daily Show&#8221;-like program that leans right &#8230;There&#8217;s a possibility that it could become a weekly Fox News show. &#8220;It&#8217;s a satirical news format that would play more to the Fox News audience than the Michael Moore channel,&#8221; says Joel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday&#8217;s Romenesko carried this blurb on a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i61fccc799efa3cb7cc70027d80722adf"><em>Hollywood Reporter</em> piece</a> (sub. req.):</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Fox News to air &#8220;Daily Show&#8221;-like program that leans right</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;There&#8217;s a possibility that it could become a weekly Fox News show. &#8220;It&#8217;s a satirical news format that would play more to the Fox News audience than the Michael Moore channel,&#8221; says Joel Surnow, an executive producer of the unnamed show. &#8220;It would tip more right as &#8216;The Daily Show&#8217; tips left.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I think a Fox* News Channel version has the potential for tons of <em>unintentional</em> comedy, but conservatism doesn&#8217;t otherwise strike me as a barrel of laughs. The other head-scratcher for me is the reference to &#8220;the Michael Moore channel.&#8221; Does Mr. Surnow refer to Comedy Central? Would anyone, anywhere get that reference out of context? Sure wouldn&#8217;t be my first guess that was my only hint.</p>
<p><small>* Surnow might refer to them as the &#8220;We Gave O.J. $3 Million&#8221; network.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2006/11/22/food-network-perhaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Definitely, Dave</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2006/10/12/definitely-dave/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2006/10/12/definitely-dave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2006/10/12/definitely-dave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Bob Woodward, a military intelligence colonel wrote humorous haikus to describe how the Iraq war was failing. Fine, but for my money if you want a funny/infuriating summary of how fucked our foreign policy is at the moment, you need look no further than Dave Letterman&#8217;s opening monologue tonight, which went something like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Bob Woodward, a military intelligence colonel <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2150955/">wrote humorous haikus</a> to describe how the Iraq war was failing.</p>
<p>Fine, but for my money if you want a funny/infuriating summary of how fucked our foreign policy is at the moment, you need look no further than Dave Letterman&#8217;s opening monologue tonight, which went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Bush has pledged that he will not attack North Korea. Of course he won&#8217;t. They actually <em>have</em> weapons of mass destruction.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2006/10/12/definitely-dave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Thought on Reunions</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2006/06/02/another-thought-on-reunions/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2006/06/02/another-thought-on-reunions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2006/06/02/another-thought-on-reunions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From TWoP: Everyone laughs, because it&#8217;s true, and nothing is funnier than watching somebody else&#8217;s stupidity pointed out. A Survivor reunion is much like a high-school reunion where you don&#8217;t have to be amazing or anything, you just don&#8217;t want to be the one with the really bad boob job about whom everyone else says, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/story.cgi?show=47&amp;story=9399&amp;page=2&amp;sort=&amp;limit=">TWoP</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Everyone laughs, because it&#8217;s true, and nothing is funnier than watching somebody else&#8217;s stupidity pointed out. A <em>Survivor</em> reunion is much like a high-school reunion where you don&#8217;t have to be <em>amazing</em> or anything, you just don&#8217;t want to be the one with the really bad boob job about whom everyone else says, &#8220;What the <em>hell</em> happened there?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I like that. Don&#8217;t worry about being the best, just don&#8217;t be the worst.</p>
<p>And no, I wasn&#8217;t reading 10-page posts about <em>Survivor</em>. Of course not. Me? What are you talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2006/06/02/another-thought-on-reunions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like &#8220;Lost&#8221;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2006/04/08/lost-caption/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2006/04/08/lost-caption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 03:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wankers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2006/04/08/lost-caption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;but this sort of shit (on broadcast TV!) drives me crazy:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but this sort of shit (on broadcast TV!) drives me crazy:<br />
<img src="http://www.jsp.org/i/2006/lost.badcaption.jpg" width="450" height="248" alt="man with on-screen subtitle reading: You're husband..." /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2006/04/08/lost-caption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HelpRod.com</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2006/03/02/helprodcom/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2006/03/02/helprodcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2006/03/02/helprodcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, CBS2 ran a story about how (IL) Gov. Rod Blagojevich did a &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; interview without even realizing it was fake news. Following the story package, I watched the anchors joke with each other about how a) Blago could have asked any &#8220;kid&#8221; about the show to get the real story, and b) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/local_story_054135102.html">CBS2 ran a story</a> about how (IL) Gov. Rod Blagojevich did a &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; interview without even realizing it was fake news.</p>
<p>Following the story package, I watched the anchors joke with each other about how a) Blago could have asked any &#8220;kid&#8221; about the show to get the real story, and b) the governor would probably fire an aide as a result of the embarassment.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about the &#8220;kids&#8221; part (remember that dust-up awhile ago when O&#8217;Reilly made disparaging comments and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/28/comedy.politics/index.html">Comedy Central revealed</a> that adult &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; viewers are 78% more likely to have a college degree than the average adult?) but I think the staff change idea might not be so bad.</p>
<p>I say that not just because somebody failed to brief the man, but also because his official re-election site is&#8230; wait for it&#8230;:<br />
<a href="http://www.rodforillinois.com/">RodForIllinois.com</a></p>
<p>Rod for Illinois? Who thought <em>that</em> was a good idea? When <a href="http://durbin.senate.gov/">Senator Richard J. Durbin</a> runs again, is he going to use DickForIllinois.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2006/03/02/helprodcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independence at 10 o&#8217;clock</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2002/12/31/independence_at_10_oclock/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2002/12/31/independence_at_10_oclock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 04:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media & Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two indepedent items mentioned in today&#8217;s StudioBrief that I found interesting simply by their juxtaposition. First, from the film news: Finally, My Big Fat Greek Wedding showed it still could surprise after 37 weeks. The film earned $2.8 million on just 951 screens for an average of $2,903 per screen &#8212; 89 percent more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two indepedent items mentioned in today&#8217;s <a href="http://us.imdb.com/StudioBrief/2002/20021231.html">StudioBrief</a> that I found interesting simply by their juxtaposition. First, from the film news:</p>
<blockquote><p>Finally, <em>My Big Fat Greek Wedding</em> showed it still could surprise after 37 weeks. The film earned $2.8 million on just 951 screens for an average of $2,903 per screen &#8212; 89 percent more than it earned a week earlier &#8212; to lift its domestic gross to $222,517,469.</p></blockquote>
<p>And from television:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the latest example of corporate synergy in the Viacom empire, the company&#8217;s <idx:item type="org">CBS</idx:item> affiliate in <idx:item type="place">Seattle</idx:item> will begin producing a nightly newscast for its <idx:item type="org">UPN</idx:item> affiliate in the same city. The 10:00 p.m. newscast being produced for the Cox-owned UPN station, <idx:item type="org">KSTW</idx:item>, will employ the same anchors and sets used at 11:00 for the newscast produced for <idx:item type="org">Viacom</idx:item>-owned <idx:item type="org">KIRO</idx:item>. &#8230; KSTW General Manager <idx:item type="person">Gary Wordlaw</idx:item> commented, &#8220;We&#8217;re very pleased to be able to bring Seattle TV viewers a local news alternative at 10:00 p.m.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On the one hand, we have a $5m film, developed outside the studio system and ranking as the #5 film of 2002 (and within $5m of the #4, <em>Signs</em>.) On the other, we have a corporation working to keep down costs by eliminating any discernible difference between news on two networks in one market.</p>
<p>Mr. Wordlaw and his masters are delusional if they truly think the same sets, with the same newscasters, from the same corporate owner, represents any real &#8220;alternative.&#8221; When will we see the indie nightly news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2002/12/31/independence_at_10_oclock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And if you thought that was weird&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2002/12/04/and_if_you_thought_that_was_weird/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2002/12/04/and_if_you_thought_that_was_weird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WtF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two more class presentations this week, both on Thursday. Tomorrow is prep for the more important one, so I wanted to review a related videotape in advance. I turned on the TV and was ready to insert the cassette when I heard a woman: &#8220;I work when I choose to, and for just a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two more class presentations this week, both on Thursday. Tomorrow is prep for the more important one, so I wanted to review a related videotape in advance.</p>
<p>I turned on the TV and was ready to insert the cassette when I heard a woman: &#8220;I work when I choose to, and for just a few hours a day I can make $10,000 a week. That&#8217;s good money.&#8221; Sure it is, the host agreed.</p>
<p>The channel was very fuzzy (the antenna amplifier was off) but I knew an infomercial when I heard it. The outlandish claim of $10k/wk inspired me to turn on the amp to see the magic product. (I could just barely discern a logo&#8217;s outline in the lower left. Was it <a href="http://www.johntreed.com/Sheets.html" title="John T. Reed's analysis of Carleton H. Sheets' books and tapes"><idx:item type="person">Carleton Sheets</idx:item></a>? <a href="http://www.donlapre.com/"><idx:item type="person">Don Lapre</idx:item></a>?)</p>
<p>Nope. It was some weird-ass talk show called <a href="http://therobnelsonshow.com/">The Rob Nelson Show</a>. Her &#8220;work&#8221;? Legalized prostitution.</p>
<p>Promos for the following segments included a woman who would run over her mother for $1m (surprise guest: her mother), and a man raising money on his website to chop off his own foot. With a guillotine, natch.</p>
<p>I gotta start going to bed earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2002/12/04/and_if_you_thought_that_was_weird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ash Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2002/11/20/ash_wednesday/</link>
		<comments>http://jsp.org/2002/11/20/ash_wednesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Wednesday, another West Wing. I was just able to catch up on the last few episodes in a tape-viewing session with Matt. I see the question of who will replace Mr. Lowe has been answered, and I&#8217;m bullish on Lily Tomlin (if I can even use that word without it sounding like a horrible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Wednesday, another <em>West Wing</em>. I was just able to catch up on the last few episodes in a tape-viewing session with <idx:item type="person">Matt</idx:item>. I see the question of who will replace <idx:item type="person">Mr. Lowe</idx:item> has been answered, and I&#8217;m bullish on <idx:item type="person">Lily Tomlin</idx:item> (if I can even use that word without it sounding like a horrible pun.)</p>
<p>I did have one question about the last episode, related to an exchange between Donna and whomever <idx:item type="person">Christian Slater</idx:item> is playing: Donna complained that Pentagon procurement was way out of control, giving the example of a $300 ashtray. (Iowa Senator <idx:item type="person">Charles Grassley</idx:item> actually <a href="http://www.thehawkeye.com/columns/Sweet/2000/csw41300.html" title="Waste unabated at Pentagon">rose to prominence</a> on this issue.)</p>
<p><idx:item type="person">Slater</idx:item>&#8216;s character smoothly fields it, noting that on impact, the super-ashtray would break into 3 smooth chunks instead of millions of sharp shards. (No word on what superpowers the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/US/9803/18/pentagon.76.screw/" title="Audit: Pentagon paid $76 for 57-cent screw">$76 screw</a> has.)</p>
<p>Donna failed to ask the simple follow-up question: why the hell are you smoking on a submarine, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jsp.org/2002/11/20/ash_wednesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

