<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On VNRs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsp.org/2005/12/08/vnrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsp.org/2005/12/08/vnrs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Reschke</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2005/12/08/vnrs/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Reschke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2005/12/08/on-vnrs/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s SO great because we used those ALL the time when I was down state in market 147...I always thought they were the biggest sham especially because we&#039;d make it look like it was our special report. A reporter would be assigned to do all the voiceovers that month. Sometimes they&#039;d even have an anchor doing a stand-up to intro it (the best was when one of the old time guys kept on delivering the lead-in with a clipboard - looked real professional). But the problem is...the viewers loved those. They&#039;d call the station all the time asking for the web sites mentioned in those things. I think they&#039;re creepy especially when they have a disproportionate amount of packs on sleep apnea...at least they did last March.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s SO great because we used those ALL the time when I was down state in market 147&#8230;I always thought they were the biggest sham especially because we&#8217;d make it look like it was our special report. A reporter would be assigned to do all the voiceovers that month. Sometimes they&#8217;d even have an anchor doing a stand-up to intro it (the best was when one of the old time guys kept on delivering the lead-in with a clipboard &#8211; looked real professional). But the problem is&#8230;the viewers loved those. They&#8217;d call the station all the time asking for the web sites mentioned in those things. I think they&#8217;re creepy especially when they have a disproportionate amount of packs on sleep apnea&#8230;at least they did last March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

