<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Savior Reid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsp</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2005/11/01/reid-our-savior/#comment-247</guid>
		<description>OK, first small detail, we don&#039;t have Plc, we have Inc., L.L.C., Ltd. or Corp.

That said, I think it would probably go down in such a way as to make the government a public company, e.g. U.S.A. Inc., and then they&#039;d sell shares. Rather than bother with the one citizen, one vote concept, they&#039;d then implement a voting system based upon number of shares owned, the Congress would declare themselves a massive Board of Directors, award themselves big bonuses, and generally start running roughshod on any non- or minority shareholders.

Or in other words, a lot like it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, first small detail, we don&#8217;t have Plc, we have Inc., L.L.C., Ltd. or Corp.</p>
<p>That said, I think it would probably go down in such a way as to make the government a public company, e.g. U.S.A. Inc., and then they&#8217;d sell shares. Rather than bother with the one citizen, one vote concept, they&#8217;d then implement a voting system based upon number of shares owned, the Congress would declare themselves a massive Board of Directors, award themselves big bonuses, and generally start running roughshod on any non- or minority shareholders.</p>
<p>Or in other words, a lot like it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2005/11/01/reid-our-savior/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>My my... It seems to be anyone in US politics you have to be a candidate for as many right wing issues and odd religious ideals as possible.

Personally I think they should abolish your govt. and just call it &#039;The Board&#039; of USA Plc, thats all it really is.

And after that random debate grenade, I shall vanish...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My my&#8230; It seems to be anyone in US politics you have to be a candidate for as many right wing issues and odd religious ideals as possible.</p>
<p>Personally I think they should abolish your govt. and just call it &#8216;The Board&#8217; of USA Plc, thats all it really is.</p>
<p>And after that random debate grenade, I shall vanish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsp</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>jsp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2005/11/01/reid-our-savior/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Ouch, that&#039;s what I get for trying to come up with clever titles on deadline. (I was trying to do some sort of play on silent session and photos that speak volumes, but it wasn&#039;t working, so I went with the replacement for &quot;Senator&quot;.)

Yeah, to say he will &quot;save&quot; us is of course terribly unlikely, but at least somebody is making an effort to examine the bullshit rationale for this sham war.

P.S. I didn&#039;t know those parts of his bio. Troubling, to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, that&#8217;s what I get for trying to come up with clever titles on deadline. (I was trying to do some sort of play on silent session and photos that speak volumes, but it wasn&#8217;t working, so I went with the replacement for &#8220;Senator&#8221;.)</p>
<p>Yeah, to say he will &#8220;save&#8221; us is of course terribly unlikely, but at least somebody is making an effort to examine the bullshit rationale for this sham war.</p>
<p>P.S. I didn&#8217;t know those parts of his bio. Troubling, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://jsp.org/2005/11/01/savior-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jsp.org/2005/11/01/reid-our-savior/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Savior Reid, the pro-life, anti-gay, formerly-Jewish converted Mormon and his smirking disciples are here to save us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Savior Reid, the pro-life, anti-gay, formerly-Jewish converted Mormon and his smirking disciples are here to save us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

