Comments on: Unfaithfully Yours http://jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/ Mon, 18 May 2009 19:25:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: moogsyqueefbone http://jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-151 moogsyqueefbone Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:00:50 +0000 http://www.jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/#comment-151 ew, and it uses that crappy soulmate, destiny crap language too. i also like how there's cards for all occasions sorry, goodbye, sexy it's so wrong. i'll post some of my housemate's, friend's mum's poetry later. she's self publishing (and shouldn't be). it's gagalicious. ew, and it uses that crappy soulmate, destiny crap language too.
i also like how there’s cards for all occasions
sorry, goodbye, sexy
it’s so wrong.

i’ll post some of my housemate’s, friend’s mum’s poetry later. she’s self publishing (and shouldn’t be).
it’s gagalicious.

]]> By: The Titillated Mr Pech http://jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-150 The Titillated Mr Pech Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:36:17 +0000 http://www.jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/#comment-150 Is that a NIPPLE?!! Sweet. Though seriously which would be worse A: Finding out your SO was sending a card like this to somebody or B: Finding out your SO is so clearly lacking a crap detector? Seriously that drivel is like something from the all time worst rejected romance novels department at Harlequin. Is that a NIPPLE?!! Sweet.

Though seriously which would be worse A: Finding out your SO was sending a card like this to somebody or B: Finding out your SO is so clearly lacking a crap detector?

Seriously that drivel is like something from the all time worst rejected romance novels department at Harlequin.

]]> By: john http://jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-149 john Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:39:28 +0000 http://www.jsp.org/2005/07/29/unfaithfully-yours/#comment-149 ew ew ew. that card is just tacky (as is anyone who would ever even consider sending it) ew ew ew. that card is just tacky (as is anyone who would ever even consider sending it)

]]>